Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action (EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Action (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and merge into Nu'est. The lack of context in this article, combined with no sourcing and no charting action makes it even more logical to merge it.. SarahStierch (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. EP charted at number four on the albums chart. Let me see if I can dig up any other information... — ξ ^xplicit 22:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per Explicit - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added a few ref's which makes it notable per WP:GNG --Michaela den (talk) 10:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.